Judicial Opinions
MMO Home Page

ITMO Home Page

Legal Counsel Home

CPO Decisions

Panel Orders

General Info - Legal

Research Resources

Standard Clauses &
Provisions

Other Court Opinions

Disclaimer

Assistant General Counsel
Budget and Control Board
1201 Main Street, Suite 600
Columbia, SC 29201
(803) 737-0600
 Companion Property v. Panel  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. The South Carolina Procurement Review Panel, Op. No. 2003-UP-174 (S.C. Ct. App. filed March 4, 2003).
  • PDF File  PDF File - Companion_v._Panel.pdf

    •  Hass v. Thomas, 183 F.Supp.2d 800 (D.S.C. 2001)  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
    Published U.S. District court case providing insight into contract controversy dispute process. Hass v. Thomas, 183 F.Supp.2d 800(D.S.C. 2001)
  • PDF File  PDF File - Hass_v._Thomas.pdf

    •  S.C. Coin Operators Assn v. DOR, 97-CP-40-1321  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
    Circuit Court order on the application of the Trade Secrets Act.
  • PDF File  PDF File - SCCOA-DOR.pdf

    •  Sloan v. DOT  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
    Sloan v. The Department of Transportation, Op. No. 26014 (S.C. Sup. Ct. filed July 25, 2005) (with underlying unpublished Court of Appeals order)
  • PDF File  PDF File - Sloan_v._DOT.pdf
  • PDF File  PDF File - DOT_Brief.pdf
  • PDF File  PDF File - Sloan_Circuit_Court_Order.pdf

    •  Sloan v. Greenville Cnty School District  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
    Sloan v. School District of Greenville County, No. 98-CP-23-2816 (Greenville, S.C., Ct. Comon Pleas, July 15, 2003).

    Opinion of a state trail court judge which overturns a school district's emergency construction procurement.
  • PDF File  PDF File - Sloan_v._Greenville_School_Dist_[98-CP-23-2816].pdf

    •  Sloan v. Greenville County, 356 S.C. 531, 590 S.E.2d 338 (Ct. App. 2003)  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
    Sloan v. Greenville County, 356 S.C. 531, 590 S.E.2d 338 (Ct. App. 2003)

    Opinion Addresses: Taxpayer Standing, Mootness, Sufficiency of a Written Determination, Admission of testimony regarding a Written Determination, Liberal Construction provided procurement laws, Role of Code Policy in construing procurement laws.
  • PDF File  PDF File - Sloan_v._Greenville_[Ct._App._Op._No._3704].pdf

    •  Sloan v. Greenville County, Op. No. 2004-UP-277 (S.C. Ct. App. dated Apr. 22, 2004)  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
    Unpublished Opinion Addresses: Sufficiency of a Written Determination and Admission of testimony regarding a Written Determination.
  • PDF File  PDF File - Sloan_v._Greenville_[Ct._App._Op._No._20004-UP-277].pdf

    •  Sloan v. Greenville [Ct. App. 2002-UP-598].pdf  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
    Sloan v. Greenville County, Op. No. 2002-UP-598 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Oct. 1, 2002)
  • PDF File  PDF File - Sloan_v._Greenville_[Ct._App._2002-UP-598].pdf

    •  Unisys Corp. v. SC Budget & Control Brd, 346 S.C. 158, 551 S.E.2d 263 (2001)  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
    Key opinion regarding the exclusivity of the administrative process created by 11-35-4230 for the resolution of contract disputes.
  • PDF File  PDF File - Unisys.pdf
  • PDF File  PDF File - Circuit court order relying on Unisys opinion

    •  United Waste v. Florence  Updated: 11/21/07 - 2:48 PM 
    Unpublished U.S. District Court opinion addressing the legal effect of a county procurement code, resolving a "protest" of a county contract award, and providing an equitable remedy. United Waste Services, Inc. v. Florence County, C.A. No. 4-96-0979-23 (D.S.C. Oct. 11, 1996).
  • PDF File  PDF File - United_Waste_v._Florence.pdf

    • About the BCB
    Updated: 04.21.2008 |  Site Comments?    		 SC GOV home page